Close Contact Us Now
Tap Here To Call Us

Articles Posted in Legal Intelligencer

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: No End-Run Piercing: Lessons From ‘Mortimer’ and ‘Dewberry’

Taken together, Mortimer and Dewberry define both opportunity and constraint. They confirm that Pennsylvania trial courts may develop an enterprise liability doctrine but also underscore that no amount of judicial sympathy can justify collapsing corporate distinctions without rigorous analysis. In the September 11, 2025 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: Discovery Risks of ChatGPT and Other AI Platforms

In the August 21, 2025 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Kelly Lavelle writes, “Discovery Risks of ChatGPT and Other AI Platforms.” OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently warned that ChatGPT conversations are not legally protected and can be used as evidence in court. Speaking on a podcast, Altman acknowledged that OpenAI…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: Bad Character, Good Evidence: Reclaiming Character Evidence for Strategic Use in Civil Litigation

In the August 7, 2025 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward Kang writes, “Bad Character, Good Evidence: Reclaiming Character Evidence for Strategic Use in Civil Litigation.” Character evidence has a paradoxical position in the law of evidence: deeply relevant in many cases, yet presumptively inadmissible. Under Federal Rule of Evidence…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: Justice at Scale: Class Action Settlements Must Deliver

In the July 17, 2025 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward Kang writes, “Justice at Scale: Class Action Settlements Must Deliver.” In June 2024, U.S. District Judge Margo Brodie in the Eastern District of New York denied preliminary approval of a proposed $30 billion swipe-fee settlement between merchants and credit…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: Uniform Protections, Civil Consequences: Litigating Employer Duties to Servicemembers Under USERRA

In the July 3, 2025 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward Kang writes, “Uniform Protections, Civil Consequences: Litigating Employer Duties to Servicemembers Under USERRA.” It is common to see businesses marking Veterans Day with social media posts thanking service members for their service and sacrifices. It is notably less common…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: Revisiting ‘Zubulake’ 20 Years Later

In the June 19, 2025 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Kelly Lavelle writes, “Revisiting ‘Zubulake’ 20 Years Later.” Introduction It has been 20 years since Judge Shira A. Scheindlin issued the landmark Zubulake decisions, a series of rulings that profoundly reshaped e-discovery practices in federal litigation. At a time when electronically…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: Reading Between the Lines: Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

In the May 22, 2025 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward Kang writes, “Reading Between the Lines: Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing.” It is not in boldface. It does not appear in the indemnity clause. And it is rarely the lead count in a complaint. But the…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: Where Do I Have to Go to Get a Decent Beer?—State of Taprooms in Pa. and NJ in 2025

In the May 12, 2025 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Aaron Peskin writes, “Where Do I Have to Go to Get a Decent Beer? —State of Taprooms in Pa. and NJ in 2025.” It is fair to say that the craft beer boom of the 2010s is largely over. The…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: Shifting the Balance: Use Offer of Judgment in Litigation

Offers of judgment encourage settlement by shifting litigation risks to the party that refuses a reasonable settlement offer, thus forcing the party to carefully assess whether proceeding to trial is worth the financial risk. Offers of judgment, if used properly, can provide strategic leverage in negotiations and serve as a…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: Litigating the Written Word: Parol Evidence Rule and the Gist of the Action Doctrine in Fraud Claims

Two doctrines frequently arise in Pennsylvania jurisprudence when addressing disputes between the parties to a contract: the parol evidence rule and the gist of the action doctrine. While each serves a distinct purpose, their application often overlaps, especially in fraud cases between the parties to a contract. Understanding both rules…